For regulated environments
The governance your compliance team asks for
Role-based access control, row-level tenant isolation, field-level encryption, and audit logging β built in, not bolted on. Your risk review will be shorter.
Who this is for
- Financial services and insurance teams handling sensitive customer feedback
- Healthcare and pharmaceutical organisations bound by HIPAA / GDPR / equivalent
- Government and defence bodies with strict data-handling requirements
- Enterprises with a procurement process that starts with a security questionnaire
The pain we solve
If any of these sound familiar, FlexiSurvey was built with your team in mind.
Access control that doesn't match your org chart
Most survey platforms stop at admin/user. Your organisation has program managers, analysts, regional leads, and external partners β each needing different scopes.
Shared tables, shaky isolation
Multi-tenant SaaS often relies on a single WHERE clause to keep your data separate from the next customer's. One bug away from a breach.
PII handled like any other column
Customer emails, respondent names, phone numbers β stored in plain text, visible to every support engineer. Not defensible in a serious audit.
No real audit trail
When the auditor asks who changed what and when, you can show login logs and hope for the best. That's not going to fly.
How FlexiSurvey fits
Capabilities we lean on hardest for this kind of work.
RBAC v2 with 149 atomic permissions
20 system roles across platform, tenant, survey, and API scopes. You can build "program manager for EMEA without billing access" without writing code. Permissions are cached in Redis for performance.
Row-level security at the database
Every tenant-owned table has PostgreSQL RLS policies enforcing tenant isolation at the database level. Defence in depth: even a bug in the application layer can't leak cross-tenant data.
AES-256-GCM field-level encryption
PII fields (emails, names, phone numbers, free-text responses) are encrypted at rest with authenticated encryption. Key rotation is versioned; deterministic hashing enables search without decrypting.
GDPR, SOC 2, and breach-response tooling
Article 15/17 data-subject requests handled in-platform. SOC 2 compliance monitoring with automated checks. DPA breach-notification automation with 72-hour deadline tracking for Article 33/34.
Typical outcomes
What teams like yours usually report in the first few months.
Shorter risk reviews
Security questionnaires go from weeks to days when the answers map onto in-platform features.
Lower blast radius
RLS, encryption, and audit log mean a single bug or stolen token doesn't compromise everything.
Audit-ready by default
Compliance monitoring runs continuously β you're not scrambling before the next external audit.
Related capabilities
Want to go deeper on any of these? Jump straight to the feature page.
Let's run through your security questionnaire
Send it over. We'll pre-fill the answers with pointers to the live capabilities, so your compliance team can verify rather than guess.
Talk to our team